A platform for development teams still running the workflow by hand
The platform built for development teams still running the workflow by hand.
Coordinators, managers, and exec teams are still pushing projects forward across inboxes, pitch decks, sizzles, freelance handoffs, mandate notes, relationship memory, and spreadsheet logic. Greenlit turns that brittle workflow into one connected platform.
Streamlined submission tool
Forward a submission, catalog the record, analyze the material, and keep coordinators out of inbox cleanup mode.
Platform, slate management, and market intelligence
Keep reads, talent, mandates, contacts, timing, context, and slate movement in one platform built for development teams.
Waterfall, escrow, and financial services
Connect title-level financial reporting, allocations, accounting logic, and recoupment workflows instead of bolting them on later.
The industry changed. The workflow never caught up.
Development teams are being asked to sell and advance more projects with fewer people, tighter timelines, more freelance coordination, and more fragmented information than ever before.
Incoming ideas still live in inboxes. Decks and sizzles still trigger manual scramble. Network and buyer context still gets trapped in notes, calendars, and memory. Reporting still gets rebuilt by hand. The people closest to the work are still carrying enterprise-grade workflow on fragile infrastructure.
Fragmented tools
Inboxes, docs, sheets, decks, calendars, and one-off systems running one workflow.
Manual coordination
Pitch materials, sizzles, submissions, and freelancer handoffs still depend on human glue.
Shared memory
Relationship context and research get lost when the system cannot hold them durably.
Lost to reporting
Status, updates, and executive visibility still get assembled after the real work is done.
Teams switch when the work is already real and the tooling still is not.
Strong development teams did not wait for the perfect software to show up. They built their own systems to keep ideas moving, get decks and sizzles out the door, coordinate freelancers, support execs, and hold onto market context when the tooling fell short.
Pitch Machine
DECKS + SIZZLESTeams built ad hoc systems just to keep pitch decks, sizzle scripts, casting sheets, and show ideas moving toward buyers.
Freelance Coordination
EDITORS + BUILDERSThe workflow already includes editors, deck builders, assistants, and exec feedback loops, but the tooling rarely reflects that reality.
Submission Handling
INBOX TRIAGEIncoming material still gets sorted, renamed, summarized, and routed through manual inbox work because the system is brittle.
Relationship Memory
BUYERS + NETWORKSBuyer notes, mandate shifts, and network context get trapped in calendars, docs, and personal memory instead of a real system.
Homemade Logic
SHEETS + SCRIPTSOperators keep building spreadsheet logic, naming systems, and lightweight automation because the category still lacks purpose-built infrastructure.
The workflow runs on effort, not infrastructure.
Development teams are doing far more than intake. They are advancing projects, coordinating deliverables, supporting executives, and preserving relationship context while the workflow keeps slipping across too many disconnected tools.
Incoming material never arrives cleanly
Ideas, scripts, attachments, and references still land in inconsistent formats that create immediate coordination work.
Every pitch request creates new overhead
Decks, sizzles, casting sheets, and materials trigger more handoffs, more versioning, and more manual project management.
Executive support becomes system glue
Coordinators and managers spend too much time translating context across calendars, inboxes, freelancers, and leadership asks.
Relationship memory gets trapped
Buyer notes, network context, and mandate shifts live in private notes and memory instead of one durable system.
The slate is hard to read live
Reads, owners, stage changes, priorities, and deal context get rebuilt across grids and status threads instead of surfacing dynamically.
Reporting is still reconstructed afterward
The system does not naturally produce clean status, leadership updates, or financial continuity, so the team has to assemble them later.
Greenlit turns that homemade stack into one connected platform.
This is where Greenlit solves the core workflow problems: submissions, live slate visibility, relationship-heavy development work, automation, and financial continuity. The platform is built to help the team run the whole motion of development, not just one step of it.
Capture what came in and route it fast
Turn inconsistent inbound material into structured records the team can triage, search, summarize, and move without inbox sprawl.
Know what is moving and who owns it
Keep the slate legible through a shared view of status, next action, ownership, deliverables, and development momentum.
Keep talent and market context attached
Bring mandate shifts, relationship notes, talent context, decks, and contact history into the same picture as the slate.
Carry the title into reporting and recoupment
Support reporting, allocations, waterfall logic, and the financial layer that should not need to restart once development hands off.
Greenlit Platform
A submission tool for the people drowning in forwarded ideas, files, and follow-up.
This is where the assistant layer belongs. It reduces first-pass clutter so coordinators and managers can spend less time sorting email and more time moving the right projects into the right lane.
Forward incoming emails and attached materials into a repeatable intake flow
Catalog sender, title, materials, and project context automatically
Analyze, summarize, and tag incoming material before it hits the team as more clutter
Route projects by mandate, stage, priority, owner, or reading lane
Keep human judgment in control while removing repetitive coordination work
Add mandate matching to the live slate.
Once the submission and slate foundation is in place, Greenlit can connect projects, buyers, mandates, talent, and market context so teams can see where a submission actually fits before they burn cycles chasing the wrong lane.
Buyer and studio mandate tracking tied to the slate
Searchable market-intelligence records across buyers and talent
Relationship mapping that stays attached to the project record
Submission-to-mandate matching before the team starts packaging
Financial infrastructure that can carry the title from financing through recoupment.
Once the studio has a durable title record and a live slate view, Greenlit can carry that same record into reporting, allocations, rights context, waterfall logic, and the path to recoupment.
Title-level reporting and accounting workflow
Contract and rights context tied to the same title record
Waterfall structures, stakeholder allocations, and payout logic
Escrow-adjacent financial controls and operating visibility
Producer and leadership reporting from one normalized data layer
One path from financing through recoupment instead of separate end-stage tooling
Financing
Keep financing context, key terms, and title-level setup attached to the same operating record.
Reporting
Normalize reporting inputs so internal accounting and external stakeholder updates use one source of truth.
Rights + Avails
Connect agreements, sold territories, avail status, and title history to the financial layer.
Waterfall
Model allocations, stakeholder shares, and payout logic inside the same system instead of a separate spreadsheet stack.
Recoupment
Carry title-level reporting into ongoing financial visibility and the workflows that matter after release.
Built for teams that needrepeatable developmentoperationsnot more tool sprawl.
Greenlit is strongest for studio teams, production companies, and development groups carrying submission volume, slate complexity, and pressure to keep pitches, materials, relationships, and internal workflow moving without adding more sprawl.
This is not meant to be generic task software. It is meant to make the work behind the work easier to run.
Proof that teams already use Greenlit to keep development work moving.
The clearest proof is simple: teams already use Greenlit to organize projects, materials, and follow-through without losing the thread of the work.
$365M+ projects managed
Large enough volume to prove the platform is not theoretical.
Production companies
Evidence that the product fits the teams doing the coordination work every day.
Active users
Ongoing usage across project management, materials, and workflow operations.
Faster packaging
A cleaner platform shortens the path from chaos to decision-ready materials.
Kevin Christoffersen, Development Exec
Why teams come to Greenlit
Built around film workflows
Greenlit is organized around how submissions, packages, notes, and reporting actually move through development teams.
Submission ops as a first-class workflow
Forward, catalog, analyze, route, and retrieve material without leaving the process in email.
Slate intelligence, contacts, and context in one place
The platform keeps reads, mandates, relationship context, and movement attached to the same title-level record.
Cleaner executive and financial visibility
Leadership gets better reporting because the workflow is already structured underneath the team and can extend into finance.
Automation where the coordination load is highest
Greenlit reduces clutter and manual triage while keeping human taste and discretion in control.
End-to-end continuity
The same system can connect submissions, slate management, reporting, and waterfall-adjacent financial workflow without restarting the record.
Two simple ways to move forward
Book an intro call
Walk through your current workflow, where it breaks, and which Greenlit layer should come first.
Get a tailored demo
See Greenlit mapped to your team’s submission flow, slate visibility, and mandate-matching needs.
That is the fastest way to see where Greenlit fits.